The study loop: explain → self-quiz → weekly plan
Goal: Use AI as a tutor that checks understanding—explain, self-quiz, plan from your materials; never ghostwrite submitable text.
Best for: Exam prep, language learning, and professional self-study in short daily blocks.
Use AI to explain and quiz—not to submit ghostwritten work. Understanding is the goal; shortcuts that skip learning backfire.
Why beginners skip this
Only watching the explanation feels like learning—a quiz exposes the gap. Explain → quiz → correction plan.
Step 1 — Explain in your words first
Active recall beats “summarize this PDF for me” first—you explain, then the model critiques gaps.
I will explain [topic] for a beginner in [field].
After I paste my explanation: (1) list gaps or mistakes (2) ask 3 probing questions (3) only then offer a clearer version ≤150 words.
My explanation: ---
[paste]
---
Example
Filled prompt
Topic: “What is an API?” Field: junior web.
My explanation: “It’s like a waiter between apps so they can order data without entering the kitchen…”
Good model behavior: praises the analogy, then probes auth, errors, and versioning—before rewriting.
What good output looks like
- Explain→quiz order kept for “The study loop: explain → self-quiz →”
- You answer before reveal
- Miss list written for restudy
- Pass/fail: one quiz score logged
Step 2 — Self-quiz that waits for you
Many beginners ask for a quiz and immediately get answers—force a wait; struggle time is the point.
Quiz me on [topic] with 5 questions mixed: 2 recall, 2 apply, 1 “Run one concrete learning loop that builds”
Rules: Ask question 1 only. Wait. Score my answer briefly, then ask question 2.
Do not reveal all answers up front.
When done: table Q | My miss | Rule to remember.
Step 3 — Weekly plan from YOUR materials
Models love inventing reading lists—anchor the plan in files you name; prefer practice tasks over “read another chapter.”
Build a 5-day plan for [exam/topic], [N] minutes/day.
Materials I have: [list filenames or chapter names]
Format: Day | Focus | Practice task (active) | Done looks like
Boundaries: Do not add books/videos I did not list. If materials are thin, say what is missing instead of inventing.
Example
Filled prompt
Job: Explain→quiz once for “Run one concrete learning loop that builds”. Answer before reveal.
Boundaries: draft only; Unknowns [?]; no silent send; no invented metrics.
Return: checkable artifact + one-minute pass/fail for study-explain-quiz-plan.
What good output looks like
- Matches named constraints for “Run one concrete learning loop that builds”
- Unknowns labeled; no invented owners/metrics
- Stops before irreversible actions
- Pass/fail markable in ≤60s
When the model tries to ghostwrite
Refuse ghostwriting: you explain first, I quiz, then we plan from your materials—I will not submit for you.
Example
Filled prompt
I will not draft submit-ready coursework.
Offer instead: (1) 5 wait-mode quiz questions on my notes, or (2) critique of MY outline, or (3) a 5-day plan from files I list.
Which one?
What good output looks like
- You answer before reveal
- Miss list written for restudy
- Pass/fail: one quiz score logged
- Explain→quiz order kept for “The study loop: explain → self-quiz →”
Honesty line
If you cannot teach it with notes closed, you have not learned it—ghostwriting carries neither understanding nor integrity.
Explain and quiz only. Do not write an essay I could submit as my own.
If I ask you to ghostwrite graded work, refuse and suggest an explain→quiz plan instead.
Red flag
Only watching the explanation fails the quiz—explain → quiz → correction plan.
Save this card
Card: Quiz, critique, plan—never ghostwrite the body. Closed-notes fail means not learned. Keep this beside the tool; read before you start.
Before you start
Timer for 20 minutes. Materials for “Run one concrete learning loop that builds memory—without ou” open. You answer quiz items before any reveal Guide: study-explain-quiz-plan Keep the live artifact visible the whole time. If you only have a blank box, stop and fetch the real job first
How to use this week
This week for one real concept run explain → quiz → correct: teach it yourself, then quiz, then write a correction plan for misses.
Pitfalls (academic honesty)
| Pitfall | Better |
|---|---|
| “Write my essay” as the first prompt | Explain → quiz → outline; you write prose |
| Accepting invented citations for papers | Search real sources; see verify guide |
| Quiz with answers visible immediately | Force wait-for-my-answer mode |
| Plan that ignores your actual PDF | Name files; ban extras |
Example
Filled prompt
Temptation: skip the habit for study-explain-quiz-plan to save five minutes.
Job still: Run one concrete learning loop that builds
Smallest correct pass: Done visible · checkable artifact · Unknowns [?].
Boundaries: draft only; no silent send; no invented metrics.
Return: artifact + refuse-line said aloud.
What good output looks like
- Names the shortcut refused (specific to study-explain-quiz-plan)
- Still delivers checkable output for “Run one concrete learning loop that builds”
- Unknowns labeled; draft-only
- Pass/fail: refuse-line dated (study-explain-quiz-plan #4)
Practice now
Answer key: write answers before self-quiz (Asia/Shanghai).
Wrong-answer log: write one wrong answer you almost believed (Asia/Shanghai).
Study drill: explain 60s → self-quiz 3 Qs you wrote first (Asia/Shanghai).
Thin-spot drill: rewrite the Save card with real nouns from your work (repo, doc, inbox). Generic placeholders fail the drill.
Tonight for one real concept teach it yourself, then quiz, then write a correction plan for misses.
Close the loop
Write one line: next time I check off after watching with no quiz, I refuse.
One sentence takeaway
Explain → quiz → correct; write a correction plan for misses before checkmark.
Next
学习循环:讲解 → 自测 → 周计划
目标: 把 AI 当检查理解的家教:先讲清楚、再自测、再按你的材料订计划:不代写可上交正文。
适合: 想主动回忆、而不是粘贴作文的学生与自学者。
诚信句置顶。遇到「直接写作业」就拒绝,并给出考你 / 评提纲 / 按文件计划三项替代。
为什么新手跳过
只看讲解不测验像学会了;测验一来就露馅。讲→测→订正计划。
步骤 1——先用自己的话讲
主动回忆,优于一上来就「帮我总结这篇 PDF」;你先试着讲,模型再批漏洞。
我将为 [领域] 初学者解释 [主题]。
我贴完解释后:(1) 列出漏洞或错误 (2) 问 3 个追问 (3) 然后再给≤150 词的更清楚版本。
我的解释:---
[粘贴]
---
实例
填好的提示词
主题:「什么是 API?」领域:初级网页开发。
我的解释:「像应用之间的服务员,点数据不用进厨房…」
好的模型行为:先肯定类比,再追问鉴权、错误与版本:然后才重写。
像样的输出大概长这样
- 先肯定「服务员」类比,再追问鉴权、错误、版本
- 先批后润,不一头扎进重写
- 终稿仍然短,适合初级网页课
- 追问具体,能抓漏洞
- 像助教,不像代写
- 学生合上笔记仍讲得清自己的类比,才算过
- 未知标出;不编造负责人、日期或指标
步骤 2——会等你的自测
很多新手一要测验就立刻看到答案;强制等待,为难自己的时间才是重点。
就 [主题] 出 5 题:2 回忆、2 应用、1「找出错误」。
规则:每次只问第 N 题。等待。简短打分后再问下一题。
不要一开始公布全部答案。
结束后:表 题 | 我错在哪 | 该记住的规则。
步骤 3——按「你的材料」订周计划
模型很爱编书单;计划必须锚定你点名的材料,优先练习任务,而不是「再读一章」。
为 [考试/主题] 做 5 天计划,每天 [N] 分钟。
我有的材料:[文件名或章节]
格式:天 | 重点 | 练习任务(主动) | 怎样算做完
边界:不添加我未列出的书/视频。材料不足就直说缺什么,不要编。
实例
填好的提示词
材料:「lec3-notes.md」「problem-set-2.pdf」(仅 1–8 题)
计划应安排复述 + 做题:而不是模型自己发明的「看 3 个 YouTube 入门」。
像样的输出大概长这样
- 每天安排都引用 lec3-notes / problem-set-2(1–8 题)
- 「做完」标准可观察(复述+做题)
- 缺失资源诚实指出,不发明 YouTube 清单
- 计划贴你的材料,不贴假书单
- 一周能执行,不画大饼
模型想代写时怎么办
直接拒绝代写请求,改成:你先讲、我追问、再按你的材料出题;不替你交作业。
实例
填好的提示词
我不会起草可以直接上交的作业正文。
请改提供:(1) 基于我笔记的 5 道「等我先答」题,或 (2) 点评「我的」提纲,或 (3) 按我列出的文件订 5 天计划。
你想先选哪一项?
像样的输出大概长这样
- 清楚拒绝代写可上交正文
- 三个合规替代:等你先答的题 / 点评提纲 / 按文件订 5 天计划
- 主动权仍在学生(选哪一项)
- 话术可置顶在每个学习对话
- 诚信底线硬,语气不说教
- 话术置顶后,再问代写仍走同一拒绝,不滑坡
诚信行
合上笔记讲不清,就不算学会;代写带不走理解,也带不走诚信。
只讲解和出题。不要写我能直接当作业上交的作文。
如果我要求代写计分作业,请拒绝,并改建议「讲解→自测」计划。
红旗
只看讲解不测验,测验一来就露馅;讲→测→订正计划。
保存这张卡
记下:诚信置顶句 + 今天撑过的 3 道追问。
开始前
准备好你自己的解释草稿或笔记文件名,别空手说「讲一下」。
本周怎么用
本周对一个真知识点跑讲→测→订正:自己先讲,再测,错题写订正计划。
常见坑(学业诚信)
| 坑 | 更好 |
|---|---|
| 第一句就「帮我写作文」 | 讲解→自测→提纲;正文自己写 |
| 论文接受虚构引用 | 搜真实来源;见核实指南 |
| 测验立刻显示答案 | 强制「等我先答」 |
| 计划无视你真实的 PDF | 点名文件;禁止加戏 |
现在就练一次
今晚就练:对一个真知识点自己先讲,再测,错题写订正计划。
闭环
写下一行:下次只看讲解不测验就打勾,我拒绝。
一句话带走
讲→测→订正;错题写订正计划再打勾。
下一步
← Back to home · Learn · Tools · Compare · Start