Competitor one-pager (fair and sourced)
Goal: One competitor page with links, quoted features, unknown gaps, and a check date—“not listed” beats invented prices.
Best for: Product/marketing weekly reviews and founder competitor scans.
Competitive notes go wrong when they become roast sessions or hallucinated pricing tables. Limit sources you actually opened. Strengths and gaps stay fair. “What to verify this week” is the most useful section.
A competitor one-pager is a snapshot with sources—not a roast. Cap claims to what you can link; mark guesses as guesses.
Blank cells are honest. Filled cells without links are theater. Prefer ugly honesty in sales prep.
Why beginners skip this
Letting the model write a competitor page from vibes feels fast—without source tiers, numbers are invented. Build the table first.
Step 1 — One-pager shape
Fill the one-pager shape from primary pages only; if a page will not open, write “not listed”—never invent pricing.
Competitor: [name]
Use ONLY sources I paste or list. Unknown is allowed.
Sections:
- What they sell (3 bullets)
- Who they target
- Pricing signals (tier + source link or Unknown)
- Strengths / gaps vs us (fair)
- What to verify this week (concrete pages to open)
No invented prices, user counts, or funding rounds.
Step 2 — Pricing-page-only brief
Example
Filled prompt
Competitor: "Northwind Analytics" public site + pricing page open in tabs.
One row: products, pricing (or Unknown), 2 proof links, one fair weakness.
No invented seats/month.
What good output looks like
- Claim pack lists sources for “Competitor one-pager”
- Primary tab opened before share
- Unknowns labeled; no vibe citations
- Pass/fail: one primary URL saved
Step 3 — Meeting use
Bring the one-pager to the meeting; contested pricing rows get a claim–evidence matrix with one owner per check.
From this one-pager, extract a 5-row verify checklist: Item | Page to open | Owner (TBD) | Due. Do not add new competitor claims.
Example
Filled prompt
Critique my one-pager for unsourced claims. Competitor cells include a remembered price with no URL.
Suggest which cells to blank and what to write instead (“not listed” + date checked).
What good output looks like
- Primary tab opened before share
- Unknowns labeled; no vibe citations
- Pass/fail: one primary URL saved
- Claim pack lists sources for “Competitor one-pager”
Save this card
Card: A competitor one-pager stays fair, allows Unknown, and never invents prices. Keep this beside the tool; read before you start.
Wear-test: show your Save card to a teammate for thirty seconds—if they cannot restate the refuse line, tighten the card tonight and date it (Asia/Shanghai).
Before you start
Open a blank claim pack. One claim about “Produce a one-page competitor brief your team” plus a slot for a primary URL. Chat citations are not enough. Guide: research-competitor-one-pager. Keep the real job visible the whole time; a blank box means stop and fetch the artifact first.
How to use this week
This week for one real competitor build a claim–evidence table with a source tier beside every row, then compress to one page.
Close the week by quoting aloud the refuse line you actually used once. If you cannot, rerun Practice now and date the pass/fail (Asia/Shanghai).
Keep it real
Run this guide’s Practice now on work you will actually ship this week—not a fictional scenario. Dated notes beat perfect theory.
Link or blank
Every price and feature cell needs a URL or the words “Competitor one-pager” Memory is not a source. Share the sheet only after a second person can click every link.
Close the loop
Write one line: next time I draft a competitor page with no source tiers, I refuse it.
Example
Filled prompt
Competitor Northwind: pricing page + features page open.
One row: products, price or Unknown, 2 proof links, one fair weakness.
No guessed seat counts.
What good output looks like
- Unknowns labeled; no vibe citations
- Claim pack lists sources for “Competitor one-pager”
- Pass/fail: one primary URL saved
- Primary tab opened before share
Red flag
Invented prices; Unknown forbidden; unfair tone—rebuild with Unknown allowed.
Pitfalls
| Pitfall | Fix |
|---|---|
| Letting the model browse unchecked | Paste sources; or verify every citation |
| Turning gaps into trash talk | Fair language; product facts only |
| Invented ARR / headcount | Unknown until a primary source |
| 8-page “strategy novels” | Hard one-pager cap |
Example
Filled prompt
Temptation: skip the habit for research-competitor-one-pager to save five minutes.
Job still: Produce a one-page competitor brief your
Smallest correct pass: Done visible · checkable artifact · Unknowns [?].
Boundaries: draft only; no silent send; no invented metrics.
Return: artifact + refuse-line said aloud.
What good output looks like
- Names the shortcut refused (specific to research-competitor-one-pager)
- Still delivers checkable output for “Competitor one-pager”
- Unknowns labeled; draft-only
- Pass/fail: refuse-line dated (research-competitor-one-pager #4)
Field note: fair one-pagers list Unknown openly. If a price is not on a primary page you opened today, leave Unknown—do not average forum guesses. Date the page (Asia/Shanghai) before you share with sales.
Practice now
Fairness pass: one strength of competitor you almost omitted (Asia/Shanghai).
Date stamp: every fact line gets accessed-on Asia/Shanghai (Asia/Shanghai).
Unknown budget: at least one [?] on the one-pager or it is overconfident (Asia/Shanghai).
Competitor drill: one-pager with 3 facts + 1 unknown marked [?]; no vibes (Asia/Shanghai).
Thin-spot drill: rewrite the Save card with real nouns from your work (repo, doc, inbox). Generic placeholders fail the drill.
Tonight for one real competitor build a claim–evidence table with a source tier beside every row, then compress to one page.
Reality check: after Practice now, write one sentence you will refuse next time—and keep it on the Save card dated Asia/Shanghai.
One sentence takeaway
Claim–evidence table + source tiers → one page; no body without tiers.
Word-floor practice
Run the Today card once on a real artifact. Write pass/fail + never-do with date Asia/Shanghai. If you only skimmed, do not mark this guide done.
Next
竞品一页纸(公平且有来源)
目标: 一页竞品表写清链接、带原文引用的功能、未知缺口和核对日。价格没有就写「未列出」。
适合: 竞品格里还有凭记忆写的价格、又没有 URL 的人。
无来源的格子留空,或改成「未列出」并写上核对日。表要干净到能直接丢进周会。
为什么新手跳过
让模型凭印象写竞品页像快;没有来源等级,数字会是编的。先建表再写。
步骤 1——一页纸结构
按一页纸形状填:只开一手页面;打不开就写「未列出」,禁止编造定价。
竞品:[名称]
只用我粘贴或列出的来源。允许 Unknown。
章节:
- 他们卖什么(3 条)
- 目标用户是谁
- 定价信号(档位 + 来源链接或 Unknown)
- 相对我们的优势 / 差距(公平)
- 本周要核实什么(具体打开哪页)
不要编造价格、用户数或融资轮次。
步骤 2——只基于定价页的简报
实例
填好的提示词
做一页表:产品、定价页链接、3 个功能(引用原文)、未知缺口、最近核对日。竞品:【名称】。禁止编价格:没有就写「未列出」。
边界:不编造;未知标 [?];发送前停下。
完成检查:一分钟内能判过/不过。
像样的输出大概长这样
- 一页纸写清:产品名、定价页链接、三个功能点,每个功能都带原文短引
- 不知道的缺口单独成栏;价格页没写就老实写「未列出」,绝不凭记忆填
- 页眉放最近核对日期(含时区意识),方便下周复查
- 整页不出现你没点开过的价目或「据说」式猜测
- 格式干净到能直接丢进周会幻灯的附页
步骤 3——会上怎么用
带一页纸进会;有争议的定价行再配主张–证据矩阵,每个核实项一个负责人。
从这一页纸提取 5 行核实清单:事项 | 打开哪页 | 负责人(TBD) | 截止。不要加新的竞品主张。
实例
填好的提示词
请批评我这页一页纸里的无来源主张。竞品格里有一个凭记忆写的价格,且没有 URL。
请建议哪一格该留空,以及改写成什么(「未列出」+ 核对日)。
边界:不编造;未知标 [?];发送前停下。
完成检查:一分钟内能判过/不过。
像样的输出大概长这样
- 指出哪一格价格是凭记忆写的,并标成「无来源」
- 建议该格留空,或改成「未列出」并补上核对日
- 批评语气冷静,像同事互查,不嘲讽作者
- 给出可直接贴回表格的改写句
- 收尾强化习惯:没有 URL 就不进竞品格
- 未知标出;不编造负责人、日期或指标
保存这张卡
一行可复用:记下:今天选的最薄一层 + 本月绝不加的那一层。标上日期。
开始前
聊天前用一句话写下主张;说不清主张,就是在逛,不是在核实。
本周怎么用
本周对一个真竞品建主张证据表,每条旁写来源等级,再压成一页。
保持真实
用本周真要交付的工作做「现在就练一次」,别编假场景。带日期的实操笔记,比完美理论有用。
有链接或留空
每个价格与功能格要有 URL,或写「未列出」。记忆不是来源。第二个人能点开每个链接后再分享表格。
闭环
写下一行:下次没来源等级就写竞品页,我拒绝采用。
红旗
凭印象写竞品页,没有来源等级,数字会是编的;先建表再写。
常见坑
| 坑 | 改法 |
|---|---|
| 价格凭记忆 | 无 URL 就「未列出」 |
| 功能不引原文 | 三点功能带引用 |
| 没有核对日 | 写最近核对日 |
现在就练一次
今晚就练:对一个真竞品建主张证据表,每条旁写来源等级,再压成一页。
一句话带走
主张证据表 + 来源等级 → 一页;缺等级不进正文。
下一步
← Back to home · Learn · Tools · Compare · Start