Make a claim–evidence matrix (simple table)
Goal: Split claims into a claim–evidence matrix that allows Unknown—pasted sources only; no invented analysis links.
Best for: Pre-meeting briefs, competitor reads, and any doc where someone will ask “says who?”
A matrix is not fancy analysis. It is a honesty device: empty evidence cells stay visible. Contested rows stay contested. Unknown stays Unknown—no fake links.
Why beginners skip this
Piling claims into paragraphs feels like research—without an evidence column, claims cannot stand. Build the matrix first.
Step 1 — Table-only prompt
Fill the matrix only from pasted real sources or notes—no memory fills; blanks stay [UNVERIFIED].
Build a markdown table with columns:
Claim | Evidence (link or short quote) | Tier (1–4) | Status (Supported / Contested / Unknown)
Rules:
- One claim per row
- No intro essay
- If I did not paste a source, write Unknown — do not invent URLs
- Tier uses my scale: 1 primary / official, 2 reputable secondary, 3 commentary, 4 rumor/social
Step 2 — Pricing-change drill
Example
Filled prompt
Make a claim–evidence matrix for these three claims about App Y. Use only sources I paste. Unknown allowed.
Claims:
1) “Stop opinions from posing as research by forcing”
2) “Stop opinions from posing as research by forcing”
3) “Stop opinions from posing as research by forcing”
Sources I paste:
- App Y pricing page screenshot text: Pro $12/mo → $15/mo effective Nov 1 (not double)
- Help center: export still listed on Free
- No official WAUs given
What good output looks like
- Claim 1 Contested or Unsupported with the $12→$15 evidence
- Claim 2 Supported or Contested based on help center
- Claim 3 Unknown — no invented analytics link
- Table pastes cleanly into the meeting doc
Step 3 — Use the matrix in the room
Bring the table, not a narrative. When someone pushes a rumor row, point at Status = Unknown. After the meeting, assign owners only to Contested/Unknown rows you still care about.
From this matrix, list only Contested + Unknown rows as a verify checklist with “Stop opinions from posing as research by forcing” Do not add new claims.
Example
Filled prompt
Live task this week (not a toy): apply this guide's Goal — Stop opinions from posing as research by forcing every claim into a table with evidence, source tier
Fill with your real artifact names/files. Constraints: no invented facts; label Unknowns; stop before send/delete/pay.
Return the working prompt + one pass/fail check I can mark in a minute.
What good output looks like
- Five rows with grades Strong/Thin/Missing
- Thin not argued into Strong
- Missing stays Missing with Unknown
- Every Strong has a link you can open
Empty cells are wins
A matrix full of Unverified is more honest than a matrix full of guessed links.
Do not bookmark-only
Finish Practice now, then tick this guide on your path. Titles unread are not skills.
Close the loop
Write one line: next time I pile claims with no matrix, I refuse to start the body.
Example
Filled prompt
Decision: postpone mobile launch two weeks?
5-row matrix: claim | evidence | Strong/Thin/Missing | link or Unknown.
Do not upgrade Thin.
What good output looks like
- Claim pack lists sources for “Stop opinions from posing as research by forcing e”
- Primary tab opened before share
- Unknowns labeled; no vibe citations
- Pass/fail: one primary URL saved
Red flag
Claims with blank evidence; memory fills—matrix rows only from pasted sources.
Save this card
Card: Force every claim to show evidence, source tier, and status—opinions are not research. Keep this beside the tool; read before you start.
Before you start
Open a blank claim pack. One claim about “Stop opinions from posing as research by” plus a slot for a primary URL. Chat citations are not enough. Guide: research-claim-evidence-matrix. Keep the real job visible the whole time; a blank box means stop and fetch the artifact first.
How to use this week
This week for a real topic build a claim | evidence | source-tier matrix; mark claims lacking evidence [to-verify].
Close the week by quoting aloud the refuse line you actually used once. If you cannot, rerun Practice now and date the pass/fail (Asia/Shanghai).
Pitfalls
| Pitfall | Fix |
|---|---|
| Asking for citations and trusting them | You paste sources; model only structures |
| Merging opinion into the Claim column | Split “we think…” into a separate notes doc |
| Filling Unknown with “probably true” | Leave Unknown; schedule a verify |
| Skipping tiers | Tier column makes rumor weight visible |
Example
Filled prompt
Temptation: skip the habit for research-claim-evidence-matrix to save five minutes.
Job still: Stop opinions from posing as research by
Smallest correct pass: Done visible · checkable artifact · Unknowns [?].
Boundaries: draft only; no silent send; no invented metrics.
Return: artifact + refuse-line said aloud.
What good output looks like
- Names the shortcut refused (specific to research-claim-evidence-matrix)
- Still delivers checkable output for “Stop opinions from posing as research by”
- Unknowns labeled; draft-only
- Pass/fail: refuse-line dated (research-claim-evidence-matrix #4)
Practice now
Empty cell ban: no blank confidence cells at ship (Asia/Shanghai).
Disconfirm hunt: one row must try to disconfirm the claim (Asia/Shanghai).
Confidence cut: any cell marked low confidence is cut from the ship (Asia/Shanghai).
Matrix-live drill: fill one row claim|evidence|confidence on a live topic (Asia/Shanghai).
Matrix drill: one claim × evidence × confidence cell filled for a live topic (Asia/Shanghai).
Thin-spot drill: rewrite the Save card with real nouns from your work (repo, doc, inbox). Generic placeholders fail the drill.
Tonight for a real topic build a claim | evidence | source-tier matrix; mark claims lacking evidence [to-verify].
Floor: Asia/Shanghai refuse-line.
One sentence takeaway
Claim | evidence | source-tier matrix; mark gaps [to-verify].
Next
做一张主张–证据矩阵(简单表)
目标: 把主张拆进主张–证据矩阵,允许 Unknown:只用你粘贴的来源,不编分析链接。
适合: 听到「价格翻倍」「取消导出」「周活两百万」这类需要当场对证据的人。
每格能指回材料才算能开会用。没有来源就标 Contested / Unknown,别为了表格好看硬填 Supported。
为什么新手跳过
主张堆成段像有研究;没有来源等级,结论站不住。
步骤 1——只要表格的提示词
只用你粘贴进来的真实来源或笔记填表,别凭记忆补洞;空格标 [未核实]。
做一张 markdown 表,列如下:
主张 | 证据(链接或短引文) | 层级(1–4) | 状态(Supported / Contested / Unknown)
规则:
- 一行一条主张
- 不要开场长文
- 我没粘贴来源就写 Unknown,不要编 URL
- 层级按我的尺度:1 一手/官方,2 靠谱二手,3 评论观点,4 传闻/社交
步骤 2——涨价传言演练
实例
填好的提示词
为 App Y 的三条主张做主张–证据矩阵。只用我粘贴的来源。允许填 Unknown。
主张:
1)「App Y 明天把 Pro 价格翻倍。」
2)「App Y 免费版取消导出。」
3)「App Y 周活 200 万。」
我粘贴的来源:
- 定价页截图文字:Pro $12/月 → $15/月,11 月 1 日生效(不是翻倍)
- 帮助中心:免费版仍列出导出
- 没有官方周活数据
像样的输出大概长这样
- 主张 1 在 $12→$15 证据下为 Contested/不支持(不是翻倍)
- 主张 2 依帮助中心:免费版仍有导出 → Supported 或 Contested
- 主张 3 周活 200 万 → Unknown,不编分析链接
- 每格允许 Unknown,不硬填
- 矩阵能直接拿去和同事对证据
步骤 3——会上怎么用这张表
带表进会议室,别带叙事长文;有人推传闻,就指着 Status = Unknown 那一行。会后只给还在吵的 Contested / Unknown 行分负责人。
从这张矩阵里,只列出 Contested + Unknown,做成核实清单:「谁打开哪一页」。不要加新主张。
实例
填好的提示词
为「我们的等待时间降了 30%」建 3 行主张–证据矩阵。每格标真或未核实,禁止编造研究或外链。
只用我粘贴的来源;空格写 [未核实]。
边界:不编造;未知标 [?];发送前停下。
完成检查:一分钟内能判过/不过。
像样的输出大概长这样
- 三行矩阵:主张 / 证据 / 真或未核实
- 每格禁止编造研究或外链
- 「降了 30%」如果无来源就标未核实
- 格式短到能贴进评审文档
- 读完知道下一步该去哪找一手来源
- 会上有人质疑时,你能点开证据格里的粘贴来源
空格是胜利
满是「未核实」的矩阵,比满是猜的链接的矩阵更诚实。
不要只收藏
先做完「现在就练一次」,再在学习路径上打勾。只收藏不练,标题变不成技能。
闭环
写下一行:下次主张堆段不建矩阵,我拒绝开写正文。
红旗
主张堆成段没有证据栏,主张站不住;先建矩阵。
保存这张卡
记下:一张主张–证据或来源分级表的核对日。标上日期。
开始前
聊天前用一句话写下主张。
本周怎么用
本周对一个真主题建主张|证据|来源等级矩阵;缺证据的主张标 [待核]。
常见坑
| 坑 | 改法 |
|---|---|
| 没有来源也硬填 Supported | 允许 Unknown |
| 用新闻当定价一手来源 | 定价页优先,新闻降级 |
| 矩阵好看但不能开会用 | 每格能指回粘贴材料 |
现在就练一次
今晚就练:对一个真主题建主张|证据|来源等级矩阵;缺证据的主张标 [待核]。
一句话带走
主张|证据|来源等级矩阵;缺证据标 [待核]。
下一步
← Back to home · Learn · Tools · Compare · Start