Reject AI slop on purpose
Goal: Name and delete empty AI phrases—keep concrete lines that sound like you.
Best for: Any draft that reads like a brochure, a motivational poster, or a press release nobody asked for.
Slop is not “Name and delete the empty phrases that make writing” Slop is unearned generality: world-spanning openers, empty metaphors, hype verbs, throat-clearing. Build a hit list. Make the model return cleaned text plus the removed phrases so you can see the crime scene.
Scene tip: Run the slop pass on the draft you planned to paste into Slack in the next ten minutes.
Why beginners skip this
Filler props the stage until a reader asks “specifically?”—run the AI-slop checklist first.
Step 1 — Keep a living hit list
Keep a living hit list of empty starters to ban by default (English delve/tapestry/unlock; Chinese 赋能/打造闭环).
- In today’s fast-paced world…
- Delve / tapestry / landscape (as empty metaphor)
- Revolutionize, seamless, game-changer, cutting-edge
- It is important to note that…
- Unlock your potential…
Chinese extras often worth banning: 赋能、打造闭环、开启全新篇章、深度链接、抓手(空用时).
Edit this draft: delete slop phrases on my list; replace with concrete nouns and verbs. Return cleaned text + removed phrases. Do not add new claims.
My list: [paste]
Draft: [paste]
Step 2 — Landing-line cleanup
Example
Filled prompt
Draft opens "In today's rapidly evolving landscape…"
Slop pass with my proof: "status meeting 30→12 min Thursday." Removed list.
What good output looks like
- Matches outline/voice freeze for “Name and delete the empty phrases that make writin”
- No AI-slop openers; one concrete proof from your notes
- Numbers/names frozen — polish does not invent
- Pass/fail: phone-skim 20s still clear
Step 3 — Make slop rejection a habit
Save the hit list next to your prompt templates (version it). When a new annoying phrase appears twice, add it.
Scan this draft for slop not already on my list. Propose ≤5 new ban candidates with one-line reasons. Do not rewrite yet.
Example
Filled prompt
Draft smells like AI: "In today's fast-paced world…" + three vague benefits.
Run reject-slop pass: delete clichés, force one concrete example from my notes: "cut status meeting from 30→12 min last Thursday."
Return cleaned draft + removed list.
What good output looks like
- No AI-slop openers; one concrete proof from your notes
- Numbers/names frozen — polish does not invent
- Pass/fail: phone-skim 20s still clear
- Matches outline/voice freeze for “Name and delete the empty phrases that make writin”
Keep it real
Run this guide’s Practice now on work you will actually ship this week—not a fictional scenario. Dated notes beat perfect theory.
Kill the fillers
Ban delve/tapestry/landscape/robust. Replace one vague noun with a concrete one you mean.
Do not bookmark-only
Finish Practice now, then tick this guide on your path. Titles unread are not skills.
One concrete noun
Replace the vaguest noun in the draft with something you can point at in the real world.
Close the loop
Write one line: next time “be more professional” is the only anti-slop ask, I refuse to start edits.
Example
Filled prompt
Opener: "In today's rapidly evolving landscape…"
Slop pass; keep proof "meeting 30→12 min Thursday." Removed list.
Context: real workstream this week (Asia/Shanghai). Name actual files/people.
Constraints: no invented metrics/owners/prices; label Unknowns; stop before send/delete/pay.
Done check: I can mark pass/fail in one minute on the output.
What good output looks like
- Numbers/names frozen — polish does not invent
- Matches outline/voice freeze for “Name and delete the empty phrases that make writin”
- Pass/fail: phone-skim 20s still clear
- No AI-slop openers; one concrete proof from your notes
Red flag
Shipping empty filler; “delve/landscape” pile-on—name and cut three fillers.
Save this card
Card: Name and cut empty AI filler—keep concrete lines that sound like you. Keep this beside the tool; read before you start.
Before you start
Name the reader and freeze facts on paper for “Name and delete the empty phrases that make.” If outline bullets do not exist yet, stop before prose. Guide: writing-reject-ai-slop. Keep the real job visible the whole time; a blank box means stop and fetch the artifact first.
How to use this week
This week run the reject-slop list on a real draft: cut filler, passive→active, keep one concrete noun per paragraph; read aloud before stop.
Pitfalls
| Pitfall | Fix |
|---|---|
| Deleting personality along with slop | Keep specific stories and plain voice |
| Replacing slop with new slop | Require concrete nouns |
| No removed-phrases list | Always ask for the crime scene |
| Only editing once forever | Living hit list in your template library |
Example
Filled prompt
Temptation: skip the habit for writing-reject-ai-slop to save five minutes.
Job still: Name and delete the empty phrases that make
Smallest correct pass: Done visible · checkable artifact · Unknowns [?].
Boundaries: draft only; no silent send; no invented metrics.
Return: artifact + refuse-line said aloud.
What good output looks like
- Names the shortcut refused (specific to writing-reject-ai-slop)
- Still delivers checkable output for “Name and delete the empty phrases that make”
- Unknowns labeled; draft-only
- Pass/fail: refuse-line dated (writing-reject-ai-slop #4)
Practice now
Specificity meter: each paragraph needs one concrete noun (Asia/Shanghai).
Cliché bin: list three banned phrases for this draft (Asia/Shanghai).
Concrete noun pass: replace three abstractions with nouns you can point to (Asia/Shanghai).
Slop-cut drill: delete three empty intensifiers; replace with facts (Asia/Shanghai).
Slop drill: delete three fluffy phrases from a draft; replace with concrete nouns (Asia/Shanghai).
Thin-spot drill: rewrite the Save card with real nouns from your work (repo, doc, inbox). Generic placeholders fail the drill.
Tonight run the reject-slop list on a real draft: cut filler, passive→active, keep one concrete noun per paragraph; read aloud before stop.
One sentence takeaway
Name nouns, numbers, and passives to cut—“more professional” is not an instruction.
Next
Negative constraints · Voice consistency · Landing copy loop · Outline before prose
主动干掉 AI 套话
目标: 删掉 revolutionize、seamlessly、unlock potential 一类空话,换成读者可检验的具体好处。
适合: 落地句或邮件开场读起来像宣传册的人。
清扫要返回两样:清理后的句子,以及删掉的短语列表。清完不要再堆新形容词。
为什么新手跳过
空话撑场面一时好看;读者一问「具体呢」,场面就垮,先跑 AI 腔清单。
步骤 1——维护一份活的打击名单
维护一份活的打击名单:英文 delve / tapestry / unlock 类,中文「赋能」「打造闭环」类,默认可禁。
- In today’s fast-paced world…
- Delve / tapestry / landscape(空洞隐喻时)
- Revolutionize, seamless, game-changer, cutting-edge
- It is important to note that…
- Unlock your potential…
中文常值得禁:赋能、打造闭环、开启全新篇章、深度链接,以及空用的「抓手」。
编辑这篇草稿:按我的名单删除套话;换成具体名词和动词。返回清理后正文 + 删除短语。不要加新说法。
我的名单:[粘贴]
草稿:[粘贴]
步骤 2——落地页句子清理
实例
填好的提示词
请删掉套话:「In today’s fast-paced world, we revolutionize your workflow seamlessly to unlock your potential.」
产品语境:面向新手的免费双语 AI 指南。
请换成具体好处。返回清理后的句子,以及删掉的短语列表。
像样的输出大概长这样
- 具体好处还在(按任务学;免费读)
- revolutionize / seamlessly / unlock potential 等禁用词消失
- 句子更短,不靠假数据撑场面
- 返回清理句 + 删除短语列表
- 像给落地页做的清扫,不是换一坨新套话
步骤 3——把拒套话变成习惯
把打击名单存在提示词模板旁边,并做版本;某个讨厌短语出现两次,就加进去。
扫描这篇草稿,找名单里还没有的套话。最多提议 5 个新禁词,各一行理由。先不要整篇重写。
实例
填好的提示词
把这份指南用到我的真实情况:[landing line full of revolutionize]。边界:不编造事实。请返回产物,以及我应跑的 3 项检查。
像样的输出大概长这样
- 针对满是 revolutionize 的标题行给出清理产物
- 附 3 项自检
- 不编造事实
- 今晚能改自己的落地句
- 拒空话变成可执行清单
- 清理后标题仍像你的产品,不像励志海报
- 未知标出;不编造负责人、日期或指标
保持真实
用本周真要交付的工作做「现在就练一次」,别编假场景。带日期的实操笔记,比完美理论有用。
杀掉填充词
禁用 delve/tapestry/landscape/robust。把一个含糊名词换成你真正想说的具体词。
不要只收藏
先做完「现在就练一次」,再在学习路径上打勾。只收藏不练,标题变不成技能。
一个具体名词
把草稿里最含糊的名词换成现实中能指给别人看的东西。
闭环
写下一行:下次只用「更专业一点」当删浆糊,我拒绝开改。
红旗
把「更专业一点」当删浆糊指令,套话只会换皮留下;要点名词、数字、被动句再砍。
保存这张卡
记下:编辑轮或译→本地化里管用的一句改法。标上日期。
开始前
先写清读者与事实清单,再让模型动笔。
本周怎么用
本周对一篇真稿跑拒浆糊清单:删填充词、被动改主动、每段留一个具体名词;读出声再停。
常见坑
| 坑 | 改法 |
|---|---|
| 用 revolutionize 等空话撑场面 | 换成读者可检验的具体好处 |
| 「再优化」三轮仍假大空 | 专开拒套话轮,列出删除短语 |
| 清完又堆新形容词 | 禁用列表置顶,长度只减不增 |
现在就练一次
今晚就练:对一篇真稿跑拒浆糊清单:删填充词、被动改主动、每段留一个具体名词;读出声再停。
一句话带走
点名词、数字、被动句再砍;「更专业」不算指令。
下一步
← Back to home · Learn · Tools · Compare · Start